Super-Curriculars for the Sciences: Read One Real Paper

Science applicants have the widest gap between what they do and what they write. Most have genuinely engaged with something. Most then describe it in a way that could have been written by someone who had not.

The fix is usually the same across all three sciences: go one level closer to the actual research, and write about the method rather than the finding.

The olympiads, honestly assessed

Every science has a national challenge and they are all worth entering:

• British Biology Olympiad (Royal Society of Biology)
• UK Chemistry Olympiad (Royal Society of Chemistry)
• British Physics Olympiad and the Astronomy & Astrophysics Olympiad

They are demanding, they are free or nearly free through school, and a medal is real evidence. Also: most successful applicants to strong science courses do not medal, and the preparation is worth more than the certificate. Enter, prepare properly, and if it goes badly you have still done the work.

Isaac Science (formerly Isaac Physics, Cambridge) deserves a special mention. It is free, it is built by a university, and it bridges A-level and first-year undergraduate physics and chemistry better than anything else available.

Reading a real paper, as a sixth-former

This is the highest-leverage move available and almost nobody makes it.

Use Google Scholar or JSTOR's open content. Search something narrow you are actually curious about. Find a paper with a free PDF. Then read it in this order:

1. Abstract — what they claim
2. Figures — look at them before the text; most papers are their figures
3. Method — how they tried to find out
4. Discussion — what they admit they cannot conclude

You will not understand all of it. That is the normal experience of reading outside your field and it stays normal for professional scientists.

The section to focus on is the method, because that is where science actually happens. Anyone can report a finding. Understanding why the experiment was designed that way, what the control was for, and what it fails to rule out — that is scientific thinking, and it is exactly what an interview probes.

Per subject

Biology. Nuffield Research Placements are the strongest single option if you can get one: a funded summer project with a real host, written up properly. Free and available to everyone: RSPB citizen science, which is genuine data collection rather than reading about data collection, and a review paper on something specific — one mechanism understood well beats a survey.

Chemistry. Chemistry World (RSC) is written for chemists rather than the general public, which is the whole point — it will show you what current chemical research and industry actually argue about. The Cambridge Chemistry Challenge (C3L6) is the natural companion to the Olympiad for lower sixth.

Physics. CERN's public and open-data resources let you handle real collision data, which is a genuinely unusual thing to have done. Jodrell Bank is a working observatory open to visitors. For depth, an arXiv preprint on something you are curious about — free, current, and closer to the research than any popular account.

Across all three. CREST Awards give structure to your own investigation, and In2scienceUK provides free STEM placements for students from lower-income backgrounds.

What a science paragraph should contain

The weak version reports:

"I read about CRISPR gene editing, which fascinated me and showed the potential of modern biology."

The strong version has a claim and a limit in it:

"The CRISPR paper I read reported 94% editing efficiency, but the control was in cultured cells, so it says nothing about whether the delivery mechanism works in tissue. That gap is where most of the difficulty seems to sit."

The second version demonstrates that you can read a result critically. It is also honest about what you do not know, which reads as confidence rather than weakness.

What science graduates actually do

Worth knowing while choosing. Across the courses we hold official outcome data for:

• Chemistry graduates fifteen months out: 17% in science and research, 12% software and IT, 10% finance, 9% science and engineering technical roles
• Physics: 24% software and IT, 10% engineering, 10% science and research
• Biology: 14% science and research, 13% business and public service roles

The pattern to notice is that a science degree is not a one-way ticket to a lab, and the number who go into computational and analytical work is large. That is a real feature of the degrees, and a more interesting thing to have thought about than a vague ambition to do research.

What goes wrong

Wonder without content. "The universe is fascinating" is not a scientific claim.

The famous-book paragraph. A small number of popular science titles appear in an enormous share of statements. Read them, but do not centre your statement on them.

Reporting findings you cannot evaluate. Citing a result you do not understand the method behind invites a question you cannot answer.

Documentaries as evidence. Watching is not engaging. If a documentary started you off, say what you did next.

Listing. Four things in four clauses. Cut to one and say what you think.

Common questions

Do I need lab experience? No. Almost no applicant has it and admissions tutors know access is unequal. Reading and self-directed investigation substitute fine.

How do I find a paper I can actually read? Search a narrow topic on Google Scholar, filter for free PDFs, and prefer review articles — they are written to introduce a field rather than to advance it.

Is an EPQ worth it? Yes, especially if it involves a genuine investigation rather than a literature review.

Should I enter the olympiad if I will not do well? Yes. The preparation is the value and nobody sees your score unless you report it.

Natural Sciences or a single subject? Different degrees with different demands. If you are drawn to the boundaries between sciences, say so specifically — that is a real intellectual position, not a hedge.

---

Writ coaches the new three-question UCAS statement with rubrics written separately for Biology, Chemistry and Physics. It never writes a word for you — it asks what an interviewer would ask about the science you claimed. Try it free.